THE DOCTRINE OF PATIENT’S INFORMED CONSENT IN THE LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE OF CZECH REPUBLIC, AUSTRIA AND THE LATVIAN REPUBLIC

  • T. I. Urkevich Doctor of Laws, sworn solicitor and legal practitioner in Riga, Latvia, Associate Professor at Baltic International Academy (Riga, Latvia) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6242-8411
  • Anatoliy Anatoliyovych Lytvynenko Doctoral candidate at the Department of Legal Sciences at Baltic International Academy (Riga, Latvia) MRes/PhD student at the Law School of Robert Gordon University (Aberdeen, Scotland, UK) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7410-5292
Keywords: medical law, informed consent, patient’s rights, patient’s autonomy, civil law

Abstract

The article represents the history, emergence and the contemporary state of development of the legal doctrine of the patient’s informed consent to medical interventions in Czech Republic, Austria and the Latvian Republic. The authors focus on the vaults of the doctrine of the doctor’s obligation to abstain from conducting any medical interventions without the consent, or against the will of the patient, since the expression of the patient’s will is the central element of his right to self-determination. In order to discover the main features of informed consent in the civil law perspective, the authors discuss the historical and current legal developments of the legal institute of patient’s informed consent. The authors conclude that the formation of the institute owes to the right to body integrity and limitation of the exercise of medical profession by practitioners, and that the civil law doctrine of informed consent differs from Anglo-American tort law, relying on statutory-based civil liability for negligence, as well as minor penal liability for battery, an occasional interpretation of unauthorized medical intervention. The authors emphasize, that the existing bodies of Austrian, Czech and Latvian case law relating to informed consent, which span for over a century, are sufficient to become a branch of Continental medical malpractice case law alongside with aged and well-developed French or Belgian medical jurisprudence, whereas the Latvian medical jurisprudence, despite having a rich history of emergence since the 1920s, has developed a solid body of case law in regard with patient’s rights relatively recently.

References

William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, N.Y. W. E. Dean / Collins, Keese & Co., Phil. Thomas Cowperthwait & Co. (1842), p. 91–92 [originally Vol. 2, p. 121].

Theodore Silver, One Hundred Years of Harmful Error: The Historical Jurisprudence of Medical Malpractice, 1992 Wis. L. Rev. 1193, 1196-1199; 1205-1206 (1992).

Charles H. Baron, Medical Paternalism and the Rule of Law: A Reply to Dr. Relman, 4 Am. JL & Med. р.р. 337, 341–348 (1978).

Robert B. Leflar, Informed Consent and Patient’s Rights in Japan, 33 Hous. L. Rev. 1, 24 (1997).

Maxim Lecomte. (1879). De la responsabilite des medecins dans la pratique deleur art, France Judiciaire Ann. 1879, p. I, р.р. 196–200.

Jacques-Pierre Brillon, Dictionnaire des arrêts, ou Jurisprudence universelle des Parlemens de France et autres tribunaux, etc. Tome 4. – Paris, 1727, p. 337.

Robert I. Field, The Malpractice Crisis Turns 175: What Lessons Does History Hold for Reform?, 4 Drexel L. Rev. р.р. 7, 10–11 (2011).

Encyclopedie methodique. Jurisprudence, Tome II, Paris & Liege, 1783, p. 618.

M. Guyot, Répertoire universel et raisonné de jurisprudence civile, criminelle, canonique et beneficiale, Tome III, Paris, 1784,. Chirurgie, Section III, p. 467.

Philippe Antoine Merlin, Répertoire universel et raisonné de jurisprudence, Tome II, Paris, 1807, see. Chirurgien, §11, Section II, p. 300.

Journal du Palais, Repertoire general contenant la jurisprudence de 1791 a 1850, l’historie du droit, la legislation et la doctrine de auteurs / par Une Societe de Jurisconsultes et de Magistrats, Tome IX, Paris, au Bureau du Journal du Palais, 1850, Medecine et Chirurgie, s. 1re, §4, p. 424 – De la responsibilite medicale, para. 109.

Legrand du Saulle, Traité de médecine légale et de jurisprudence médicale, Paris, 1874, p. 186.

F. Dubrac, Traité de jurisprudence médicale et pharmaceutique, Paris, 1882, p. 97 (Responsibilite civile, para. 92).

Henri de Bonnechose, La responsabilité du médecin devant les tribunaux, Revue de Deux Mondes (1er juillet 1962), p.p. 89-101, p. 91.

Dictionnaire des arrests, ou Jurisprudence universelle des Parlemens de France, et autres tribunaux, Tome 1, Paris, 1711, see. Apothecaire, Sec. 38, p. 129.

M. Guyot, Repertoire universel et raisonne de jurisprudence civile, criminelle, canonique et beneficiale, Tome I, Paris, 1783, see. Apothecaire, p. 482.

Philippe Antoine Merlin, Répertoire universel et raisonné de jurisprudence, Tome I, (4 Ed.), Paris, 1812, see. Apothecaire, Sec. III, p. 263. A. Favre, Du secret medical, Association des medecins de Rhone / Assemblee generale de 1874, Lyon, Association Typographique, 1874, p. 2–3.

J. Th. Dupuy, Le dogme du secret medical, Paris, Societe d’editions scientifiques et litteraires, 1903, p. 13.

Andre Hallays, Secret professionnel / These pour le doctorat, Paris, Libraire nouvelle de droit et de jurisprudence, 1890, Chapitre II, p. 44.

Tomáš Doležal, Právní povaha informovaného souhlasu a následky neúplného poučení z hlediska civilního práva, Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky 1/2019, s. 55. I. Tart, De la responsabilite des persones. Art du guerir. (20.07.1894). La Belgique judiciaire (Bruxelles), Ann. 1894, p.p. 1057-1072, see in particular 1070-1072.

R. Demogue, Traité des obligations en general, Tome VI (1932). Paris, Bibl. A. Rousseau, p.p. 186–187.

C. Hennau-Hublet, L’activité médicale les délits d’atteinte à la vie, à l’intégrité physique et la santé des personnes, Rev. dr. pén. &; Crim. 1986, p.p. 571-597, see in particular p.p. 591–597.

G. Jasson. La Responsabilite Medicale, Rev. Belg. Domm. Corp., 1990, p.p. 47–53.

Ruth R. Faden, Tom L. Beauchamp & Nancy M. King, A History and Theory of Informed Consent, New York, Oxford University Press, 1986. – р.р. 116–125.

M. Earle, The Future of Informed Consent in British Common Law, 6 Eur. J. Health L. Р. р.р. 235, 235–237 (1999).

Baikovs А.М. Civiltiesību vispārīgā daļa. Rīga: Hoļda SIA, 2006.

Baikovs A., Saistību tiesības. Atsevišķi saistību veidi, SIA «JUMI» & Co. Rīga: 2005.

Torgāns K. Saistību tiesības. Mācību grāmata. Rīga: TNA. 2014. – р.р. 34–35.

Baikovs А. Saistību tiesības. Vispārīgi noteikumi par saistībām. SIA «JUMI» & Co. Rīga: 2005.

Torgāns. K. Latvijas Republikas Civillikuma komentāri. 1535.pants. Rīga, «Mans īpašums», 2000. – p. 93.

K.V., Vai ārstam ir tiesība izdarīt dzīvību apdraudošas operācijas bez slimnieka vaiviņa piederīgo piekrišanas un kāda ir viņa atbildība slimnieka nāves gadījumā. Jurists, Nr. 7 (01.10.1932). – Riga, 1932.

Ārsta atbildība pēc 1933. g. sod. lik. 218. un 219. p.: Referāts / Alfrēds Jākobsons. – Riga, 1936., p. 5-ff.

Published
2022-04-15
How to Cite
Urkevich, T. I., & Lytvynenko, A. A. (2022). THE DOCTRINE OF PATIENT’S INFORMED CONSENT IN THE LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE OF CZECH REPUBLIC, AUSTRIA AND THE LATVIAN REPUBLIC. Medicne Pravo, (1(29), 49-94. https://doi.org/10.25040/medicallaw2022.01.049
Section
Articles